At the instigation of the Victorian Attorney-General, the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) will conduct a major review of rules governing class actions and litigation funders.1 Pursuant to terms of reference published on 19 January 2017, the purpose is to ensure that claimants who seek to enforce their rights in funded proceedings are not exposed to unfair risks or disproportionate cost burdens.2 It follows a year in which the amount, speed and administration of payments to funded claimants dominated class action headlines, raising access to justice concerns.
The terms of reference are broad, and raise a range of important issues that have been debated intensely in the class action space over the past 12 months.
- the scope for increased supervisory powers of courts and regulatory bodies over litigation funders, such as clearer disclosure requirements and limits on commission rates;
- removing the prohibition on contingency fees (except in areas currently considered inappropriate, such as personal injury, criminal and family law matters) as a means of mitigating the issues presented by litigation funding practice; and
- importantly, introducing additional rules for class action proceedings (and other similar proceedings involving representatives), such as certification requirements as a prerequisite to allowing a proceeding to continue, and/or specific criteria for settlement approval.
Currently, litigation funders are subject to minimal regulation and the threshold for commencing class action proceedings is low. In view of the developments and activities in the last 12 months, a review of the current state of play is timely to address concerns of opportunistic claims and to increase the efficiency of class action proceedings.
The report by the VLRC is due 30 March 2018.
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2022