Follow us


Earlier this year, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) issued its hotly anticipated judgment on whether to certify the £14bn opt-out damages action brought by Walter Merricks CBE against MasterCard under the UK's nascent competition collective redress regime. In this article, Stephen Wisking, Kim Dietzel and Molly Herron consider the CAT's decision to refuse certification and its implications for third party funding of such actions. 

Please click here to read the full article.

This article was first published in the October 2017 issue of Litigation Funding.

Key contacts

Stephen Wisking photo

Stephen Wisking

Partner, London

Stephen Wisking
Kim Dietzel photo

Kim Dietzel

Partner, London/Brussels

Kim Dietzel